San Mateo Supes Support Endangered Species Act
(Bay
City News ) SAN MATEO
In a
unanimous vote, the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution
Tuesday in support of the Endangered Species Act.
The
33-year-old act "provides for the conservation of species that are
endangered or threatened with extinction and the conservation of the ecosystems
on which they depend," according to Supervisor Jerry Hill.
Since it was
passed in 1973, the act has worked as a "safety net" helping to
protect many species on the brink of extinction, Hill said. "This
community has demonstrated time and again its commitment to protecting the
environment."
The San
Bruno Mountain Park houses several endangered species including, the San Bruno
Elfin, Mission Blue, Callippe Silverspot, and Bay Checkerspot butterflies,
according to the San Mateo County Web site.
Another
threatened species, the San Francisco Tree Lupin Moth, once inhabited San Bruno
Mountain Park, but urban development decimated the population, according to the
county Web site.
The
Endangered Species Act has "done more to preserve the quality of life in
San Mateo County," said Brent Plater, staff attorney for the Center of
Biological Diversity.
Hill stated
that "over 200 species in the Bay Area alone, many of them residing in San
Mateo County refuges such as Montara Mountain, Edgewood Preserve, San Bruno
Mountain and the wetlands of Rockaway beach and those adjacent to Belle Air
Elementary School in San Bruno, are officially designated species of concern."
While many
support the Endangered Species Act, U.S. Rep. Richard Pombo, R-Tracy, has
spearheaded legislation that looks to modify the act.
Pombo's
bill, which was passed by the House in September, would revise various sections
of the Endangered Species Act "relating to determinations of endangered or
threatened species, recovery plans for such species, and the role of states and
private property owners in protecting such species," according to the
bill.
"The
Endangered Species Act is not perfect, but gutting such a vital protection is
not the answer," Hill said. "Protections are working."
Plater said
there is other legislation currently in circulation that follows a similar path
as Pombo's bill, but that Pombo's is "the most drastic."
"He has
an ideological belief that endangered species should not be protected,"
Plater said.
More
information on endangered species in San Mateo County can be found on the Web
site, http://www.co.sanmateo.ca.us.